About Lisa's Collection
Lisa's Collection is a spare-time endeavor that's aimed at organizing my other spare-time endeavors.
I do quite a bit of online writing, and after building up a collection of material for quite awhile, I realized it was time to organize it a little better than I’d being doing.
So, I decided to start Lisa's Collection. Because I write on a variety of subjects, however, I realized that my writing really wouldn’t be sufficiently organized through the use of one blog. For that reason, I decided to make this site a “Hub” site, from which material on individual subjects can be found at the links provided. This site is my “miscellaneous department”, because most efforts to organize a wide variety of things require a “miscellaneous department” for whatever it is one is attempting to organize.
My original plan for this site was to let it be a foundation for later, more blog-like, activity; and in the meantime, post writing and whatever I thought might add a little something. When it comes to spare time, however, one can’t always count on having enough of it.
As a result, in spite of how long this blog has been in existence, it still remains fairly embryonic. It is, as they say, what it is.
(With the exception of "Life on Key", blog links may be temporarily disabled.)
If You're Interested In What I Write About....
As a freelance- and contract- writer/researcher, my background (at least the part of it that directly relates to writing) includes projects in a corporate setting, newspaper experience, and various other projects on a freelance basis.
Newspaper experience includes straight news and weekly features. I've spent several years studying/researching the subjects of child development, education issues, learning problems, and giftedness in children - all for a long-term project. Most recently, I've been writing articles and other material on assignment. In my spare time I write for my own enjoyment, which often means writing about family and social issues in an attempt to share any insight I think I may have picked up on my journey from there to here. My HubPages writing (and writing featured on this profile) is that spare-time writing. "Lisa's Children's Corner" is a collection of articles/essays (as well as some links to some expert sites that I respect) on a number of issues related to children.
About the Kind of Writing I Do on HubPages and Elsewhere Online
Psychology, values, and inspiration are among favorite areas of writing. Other things I've written about include being a mother, becoming a mother through adoption, as well as the more conventional way; miscarriage, and motherhood in general.
Growing children, growing as a person, and staying young are among my writing areas of interest. So are diet, fitness, women's issues, writing, aging, computers, and technology.
Love, relationships, marriage, divorce, and independence are areas in which I've written. I've also written about loss and grief in response to requests for something on those subjects. I'm nowhere near as serious a person as a lot of my Hubs would seem to suggest. I dabble in light poetry here and there, as well as the occasional humor piece or two. Home-buying, personal finance, and fashion are among subjects about which I've written.
I'm pretty good with toddlers and pets. I can be a worrier, and when I'm not worrying I've been known to wonder whether I should be worrying. The safety and security of children are things I've written on. I've imagined what I'd say to the world if I had 15 minutes of fame. Speaking of the world, I'm both a belly-acher, and a dreamer.
Since I'm an American, I've written about the 11 Federal Holidays, The U.S. Constitution, whether American kids are growing up too fast, and what may be the cause of the rise in childhood obesity. The Plight of the American car is something else I've pondered.
As a part-time kid, I love Barbie dolls and Santa Claus . As a most-of-the-time grown-up, I think stress is one of biggest health risks so many people face
The topics listed above are among many of things I've written about, but (I shouldn't admit this) I'm not above just writing some giant, long-winded, Hub about pure foolishness. One of these days I'll weed out the pure-foolishness Hubs, but for now they're still up. I don't know... sometimes you just have to relax and write something foolish just for fun.
May 23, 2011
My Writing Identity-Crisis, Part One
Scraping and scrapping for new work, on the other hand, can tend to bring an ever-present sense of insecurity that is far from a false one.
I've spent a lot of time accepting that a lot of people in the world don't have their dream job or business. I'm well aware of the reality that the world is full of people who don't have their dream job. It's also full of people who are satisfied to know that any job can be dream job enough when it keeps over a roof over one's head, feeds one's children, and maybe even leaves a little left over for building other incomes and/or saving.
Actually, after years of some of the non-work-related stuff going on in my life, my dream job at this point might actually be "no job". :lol:
The business-me isn't above cashing in on my ability to put together whatever it is someone else wants me to write in order to make the money I need to live. Neither is the business-me unwilling to set aside years' worth of hard-earned background in an area completely unrelated to writing, and find ways to make what once mattered on my resume seem to at least remotely relate, and therefore kind of matter, to anyone considering hiring me for their writing-related project(s). I am, after all a grown-up - and who has that business-me that knows the value of adjusting to changes in economic climates, industry changes, and even personal circumstances.
In truth, it isn't so difficult to be "unwilling to set aside years' worth of hard-earned background" when that hard-earned background has already has some fractures in it as a result of personal choices. See, that's where the person-me made things that much more complicated for the business-me. The person part of me has been a woman since - oh, I guess - the 1970's. Before that, the person part of me was a girl.
Back in the 1970's when I was just starting out as a grown-up I did what so many other young women do, which was to focus on working my way up the corporate ladder. Of course, being young and just starting out, I didn't realize how quickly the mid-70's would turn into the late 70's; so before I knew it, I was getting married but also involved in adopting a baby (long story that I won't go into here). The person-me and the business-me were actually getting along quite well at that time. (There was a whole set of circumstances that, when combined, meant the whole picture wasn't all that complicated or challenging. Again, long story that I won't go into here.) There's no doubt, however, that starting a family did have its impact on that corporate-ladder-climbing that I'd had in mind. If I think of the "scheme of all corporate-ladder-climbing" in the world, I have to say that I never actually made my way to even the middle of any corporate ladders. At the time, and considering my age then, being on the low rungs of a ladder didn't feel like a permanent thing. I could see what was ahead and what would be required, as far as any climbing went. When you're just starting out in the world of being a grown-up, all you can see is an outline of your own future. When it comes to how you'll fill in that outline, all you can really do is imagine it.
Well actually, when I said that the person-me and business-me were getting along well, I meant "for awhile". The thing with ladder rungs is this: When you start to go from the lowest ones to the next ones up, somewhere along the way people start wantiing you to do things like travel and be happy to stay until "all hours" at the drop of a hat because the company president suddenly wants something like a set of figures that are going to take several hours, and several people's worth of input, to put together. That's when the rubber really starts to meet the road. Or, should I say, that's when the sole really meets the ladder rung? Or, then again, might it be more appropriate for me to say that that's when the SOUL meets the ladder rung?
When it comes down to it, that person-me is actually the whole me. The business-me is really only a part of me. When the soul (or the sole) meets the rungs, it turns out the part of a person that gets the best footing can often be that whole person - not just a part of her.
The business-me AND the person-me did what so many other women do when the role of mother is introduced to the picture, and that was to discover the reality that life isn't a simple matter of person-me and business-me once a child comes along. A whole new set of "me definitions" emerged. First, there was the "whole me". That me was divided into the "me as just me", which was further divided into that old person-me and then into the separate business-me. Another part of my identity was "the mother me", which was in its own category and yet also had been assimilated into "the whole me". As most mothers will tell you, I'll tell you that the whole identity thing became quite the complicated affair.
I'd later discover that the divisions get even more complicated as each new child comes along.
What we women often learn (at least those of us with all those "me's") is that we need to find a way to make them all co-exist happily. Why? Because having all those me's means having a full, whole, life. Abandoning any of those identities means abandoning, or at least postponing, having that full life. To one extent or another, and depending on the job and the number of children a woman has, all those identities do fight with each other in any number of minor and major ways.
We've all heard the saying, "You can have it all, but you can't always have it all at the same time." Well, like so many young people, I believed I could have it all because I knew how "smart" I was at managing myself and my life. Maybe SOME people couldn't have it all, but that was SOME people (maybe even most people). It wasn't me. I was, I thought (as so many young people do) different from all those other people. I looked around at what I'd accomplished and all the odds I'd overcome, and I looked all the way back from childhood to the then present and saw someone who had always found getting what she wanted, and proving "everyone else" and conventional wisdom wrong, fairly effortless. I made sure any confidence I had had been based on reality, not just thin air; and I used every little bit and piece of reality for building a foundation of confidence in my own ability to have it all, do it all, and give 120% or more to any number of things at the same time. Of course, there is no such thing as 120% of anything, and part of that whole picture I mentioned was reduced work hours and a mother who was so close to my son I was convinced that her taking care of him while I worked was as good as my caring for him.
In fact, with the reduced hours giving me time with him, I saw his time with my mother as "something extra", not "something less", in his life.
The minor issues I'd noticed as I'd begun to work my way up were, in fact, fairly minor. The business-me knew how to deal with such minor issues. ("After all, I wasn't just capable, hard-working, and business-minded. I was skilled with dealing with people and situations.")
Life often has a way of teaching young, confident, people that all is not determined by intelligence, skill, performance, willingness to work, and determination. No, life sometimes has its own agenda for us; and sometimes as that agenda for us is thrown like a monkey wrench into our previously neat and well managed lives, we can both have our previously naive sureness threatened and also find new building blocks for a new, but different, kind of confidence.
Life had its own agenda for me when the time came for me to have our second child. All seemed to be going according to plan until complications arose with the pregnancy that would otherwise not have posed too much challenge when it came to my work responsibilities, and even forward progress. When I say, "complications", I really mean "complications". They were complications that lasted for 20 weeks, and completely separate complications resulted at work, against the backdrop of all that a woman experiences as she fears the baby she's expecting will not survive. If there's one thing that can let a whole lot of air out of that "confidence balloon" of being young and sure, it's having a life that had seemed to be close to fairy-tale perfection suddenly involve the very un-fairy-tale-like matters of threatened miscarriage and fetal heartbeats that seem ominously and terrifyingly silent.
After having "the fetal remains" removed at 20 weeks, I returned to work the day after I got out of the hospital. Sad as it all was, I had visions of returning to my pre-miscarriage, almost-perfect, life and moving on in the same direction I've been moving. I continued working for awhile, and I kept my youthful sureness of my own ability to put things in perspective and certainly not let one bad event affect the rest of my life. This was the early eighties, though, and there were some slowdowns taking place. That meant that projects once said to be waiting for approval seemed to remain in a perpetual state of waiting for approval. I understood the need for belt-tightening, and I under that it wasn't permanent. Still, in times when things aren't looking good work- and income-wise, it can be difficult to keep feeling sure. Any sensible person (especially a sensible business person) knows that feeling sure of some things really isn't always the most realistic way to feel.
The miscarriage, as it turned out, had taught me yet one other lesson. That was that even when we feel confident in our own ability to put the big, bad, things in life in perspective; and even when we rely on our own strength and solid thinking to overcome grief; how much of the "small-stuff crap" we're willing to tolerate changes. When life is close to a fairy-tale, and when we're feeling "all happy and secure", it's not too difficult to put up with a few setbacks or uncertainties in something like the work setting. When you're already "not in the mood for any crap" it doesn't take too long before the exit door starts looking like an entrance to a new and better life.
When you're on the lower rungs of a ladder, and all you can see is that outline for what's ahead, there's not much solid above you that appears to anything much to hold onto. Also, from those lower rungs of a ladder, there's not a lot of risk involved in jumping off.
When I walked through that exit door and found my high-heeled shoes treading carefully on the light blanket of snow that had covered the parking lot, I guess you could say that was when the soul hit the road in a couple of different ways.
Clearly, if I was going to find a way for all those different "identities" of mine to happily co-exist, the terms under which the business-me operated would have to be my own. I was no longer a 22/23-year-old girl starting life as a grown-up. I had those high-heeled shoes of mine firmly dug into the challenges and realities of building a family, learning how to process and overcome a kind of grief that I hadn't before run into in my life.
My plan was to do contract work and build up my own business that way. My plan was also to have that second child I'd thought I'd planned for before. The plan for the contract work started out OK. The plan for the second child wasn't going so well. Back to that lesson about how life sometimes gives us what we don't want: It also sometimes doesn't give us what we do want. I don't know if everyone learns this stuff, and when anyone else does. I was about 28 when I figured it out.
Sometimes, it turns out, life just may not give us what we want when we want it. I was 29 when my little son was born. Having that healthy pregnancy took a worrisomely long time to happen, and life (or something) decided that my little son would arrive 6 weeks earlier than he should have. Having a premie brings with it its own set of experiences, and sometimes those heels I had so firmly dug into reality seemed to sink a little farther down into it than was comfortable. Then again, I was floating on air. This was yet another lesson I learned: We can be solidly and firmly grounded in reality, floating on air, and eve sinking into a little bit of quicksand - all at the same time. It turned out, I'd discovered, that we (especially, maybe, women and mothers) don't just discover increasing complications as we discover new identities and part of ourselves. We discover that what we're doing, or how we're feeling, at any given time is no longer about just "me and how I how feel at the moment". It becomes about "all the parts of me, and all the different ways I feel about any number of different things at any given time".
I cringed a little, though, because some of my blogs have "ego" titles. The thing is, though, it was not my ego at the root of my choice for some of the "Lisa" blogs I have.
When I started putting together blogs as way of finding a home for a lot of the writing I'd already done (with the plans of further developing them later), I wasn't particularly thinking of earning money from them. I was thinking of finding some way to organize my writing in what I hoped was an attractive "environment" that gave me the freedom to later add whatever I wanted to add.
Names like, "No Senior Coffee" and "Storm Clouds and Wind Chimes" just kind of came naturally. Then, though, I had some writing that only loosely fit into "categories", and I realized I had to come up with some cohesive name for each of those "categories". I was thinking almost in terms of names for file folders when I created the names, although, because blogs have a public nature, I thought I'd try to add something "catchy" to titles that were essentially "file folder titles".
So, along with the titles mentioned above, and along with "Dabblings in Verse", I have a whole lot of "Lisa" titles - "Lisa's Collection", "Lisa Light", "Lisa's Christmas Card", and on and on and on. I knew when I created the titles they wouldn't particularly be searched for by the public. My aim, though, wasn't really to have people search for them (in view of the fact that I wasn't try to make money with them). The plan was to direct readers to the blogs from other writing sites where my name is associated with my writing. In other words, all I wanted to do was categorize and make available my writing. I wasn't looking to become a famous Internet "presence" with it.
When I saw someone refer to personal-name titles as "ego titles" I did cringe because it occurred to me that anyone who sees some of my blogs may assume it was ego at the root of some of the titles. It wasn't, and I don't want anyone thinking it was. The "Lisa line" of titles is only a matter of "file-folder" thinking, as well as my disregard for whether or not anyone finds the sites without being directed to them by me.
I know that addressing this can come across as "defensive" of me, and that nobody really cares how or why I came up with any particular title. It isn't intended to. It's just that I'm "so-at-the- opposite-end-of-egotistical" it does kind of bother me to think that anyone - even a stranger - would believe it was ego at the root of some of the titles.
There's More to Organizing Than Just Organizing
Don't get me wrong. I enjoy writing, and I even enjoy writing for other people. It's just that, as most writers will tell you, after awhile it isn't enough. So, it was a few years ago now that I began writing on writing sites. I enjoy writing on a few sites, and what I post on any of them depends on the kind of site it is.
The trouble is (without going into any specific details), ever since I've been enjoying writing online in my spare time (and picking up a fairly decent extra income at the same time), I've always kind of felt a little "off key" because, as much as I enjoy writing on writing sites; I haven't been writing the kind of material that's really what I want to write. People who spend much time on writing sites usually know that there's often debate (arguments) between those who write for money and those who write for love, or for art. My feeling off key has nothing to do with that particular (and ever famous) debate, because in a lot of ways I fit in with both sides of that particular writing coin. It more has to do with my own setting limitations on the kind of material I'll write on any site.
For example, I won't post anything I really care about on the Internet because I know too well how often some kinds of articles are stolen. I'm used to it. I do what I can about it. Still, I'm not about to post some pieces of writing in what amounts to an "up-for-grabs" venue. Then, too, there are things I'm just not going to write about. For the most part, I don't want write about objects. My wish to keep some personal business private means I'm not going to put on the Internet some things that I'd really like to write. The list of what I don't want to write goes on and on. So does the list of what I won't put on the Internet. As a result, I've found some kind of safe, middle-ground, of writing; and then I've adjusted whatever falls under the category to be as close to acceptable as it has to be on any given writing site. That's fine. I enjoy writing online, and I'll probably continue to use online writing as one of my spare-time endeavors. Still, the fact is, for several years now I've been trying to figure out what it is that has made me always feel kind of off-key when it comes to a lot of my online writing.
So often, when people are talking about how writers want readers for their work. I've always wondered if there's something wrong with me, because I plain, old, don't care if my work is ever read. Oddly, however, when I write I do write with the reader in mind; and all through the writing process, I'm imagining how a reader may react to the words I so carefully try to make click into place.
Also, there have been times when writing discussions have been about how writers want to keep getting feedback on their work, often in order to continue to edit and improve it. My thing has always been that I see each piece of writing almost as a kind of child of mine: I do my best to get it to maturity; and I send it out into the world, where it will inevitably sink or swim. Thinking of this brings to my mind the last scene in the animated version of E.B. White's Charlotte's Web, in which all Charlotte's spider eggs have turned into baby spiders that scurry away from the web she wove. (I know that making reference to "sink or swim" and spider eggs is mixing metaphors. Sorry. Sometimes I break some rules.)
In any case, over several years I've sent a very large number of "spider babies" out into the world; but as the real-life mother of grown sons and a daughter, I've learned that we remain parents no matter how old our babies are, whether or not they remain in the nest, or how far they roam from it. I don't know... As I've been trying to figure out what it is, exactly, that has been making me feel quite so off-key, it has occurred to me that no matter who, or what, we see as our "children", no mother just tosses them out into the world when they still need her and says, "Sink or swim, babies!" So why is it I've been so cavalier about tossing my own creations out into the Internet world and pretty much not been interested in ever seeing them again? I guess it's because, while they're mine, a whole lot of them are certainly not "Me" (at least not in terms of "Me, as a professional writer").
On the one hand, my spare-time "creations" are, most definitely, very much "Me, the person". The trouble is that "Me, the writer" judges my own (often more casual) writing through the eyes of someone who tends to think that only the most "professionally written" pieces of writing have a right to exist. The trouble is also, however, that "Me, the person" has a lot of things to say (for one reason or another. Not only that, but "Me, the person" just plain enjoys writing what "she" feels like writing. Sometimes the old "being of two minds" is easier than other times. Well, maybe it isn't so much "being of two minds" that's a challenge. Maybe the problem is more related to having one activity (writing) in which both of those minds are involved.
Sometimes, when I meet one of my better pieces of writing "on the street" I think, "Hey. This isn't so bad. Maybe I should like it more than I do." Sometimes, too, when I go out looking for any pieces of writing that I've never really liked, I'll realize that it never stood a chance because I didn't give it the time or chance that I gave some of its siblings. And so, I suppose, one reason I've for so long felt off-key is that I know I've sent so many of my creations out into the world without caring what happened to them. Oh, I have my writing and my projects that I very much care about. It's just that the stuff I put online is not that. The funny thing is, though, that we can think we don't care about our creations much until one day, we look out into "the streets" and realize that we are looking at something that is far more a part of us than we'd realized. I suppose, too, one problem has been that while I'll never really feel very much a part of the Internet "streets", I've been aiming to make my creations street-savvy because I've known I have no intention of becoming a part of their world.
I have my plans for how I'll approach any spare-time writing I do from here on out. In the meantime, though, I've decided to build a home for all my wayward creations, call them home, and do for them what I should have done in the first place.
Those of us who have been on writing sites recently know that these days duplicate content is being frowned on more and more. By setting up a home for my wayward creations I'll be turning them into duplicate content (if they haven't already been). I can't worry about who, out there in "Internet-Land" likes it, though; because my creations have, for too long, been fending for themselves. They need to come home now. They need me to start caring about them.
For now, their home will be on the blog, "Life On Key". I'm going to move them later.
0 comments:
Post a Comment